Sandra Demaria, MD • 2024 SITC Election

Sandra Demaria, MD

Sandra Demaria, MD

Sandra Demaria, MD
Weill Cornell Medicine

Biography

Dr. Demaria is a Professor of Radiation Oncology and Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM), and a member of the Experimental Therapeutics Program at the WCM Meyer Cancer Center. She is a translational investigator with expertise in immunology and pathology whose research is focused on innovative strategies to increase tumor responses to cancer immunotherapy. She is internationally known for her studies demonstrating the synergy of local radiation therapy with anti-CTLA4 and other immunotherapies in pre-clinical models of cancer, and for identifying key molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced in situ vaccination. She heads an NIH R01-funded lab investigating the mechanisms of response and resistance to combination of radiation and immunotherapy in both preclinical models as well as cancer patients. As a breast cancer pathologist she also studies the immunological microenvironment of breast cancer in patients, and therapeutic strategies to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy in this disease. Dr. Demaria received her BS and MD degree from the University of Turin, Italy, and completed her residency in pathology at NYU School of Medicine, where she later also served as co-leader of the cancer immunology program of the NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center. Dr. Demaria was the Chair of the AACR Cancer Immunology Working Group from 2020 to 2022 and has received numerous honors for her work including the 2019 University of Pennsylvania John M. Yuhas Award, the 2021 SITC Team Science Award, the 2022 Bridge Award for outstanding and lifelong contribution to immunotherapy research, and the 2023 European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) honorary membership.

She has been an active participant in the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer since 2008, serving as a strategic task force member, faculty for workshops, annual meetings, and several educational/career development activities including Sparkathon and Women in Cancer Immunotherapy Network (WIN) Leadership Institute. She also served as the Chair of the 2019 and 2020 annual meeting, SITC Board Director from 2014 to 2017, and has served as a member of Awards Committees and the Finance Committee and is a Section Editor for JITC

SITC Election Platform Statement

What are the two or three critical issues facing the field of cancer immunotherapy?

1. Immunotherapy has transformed cancer care for many patients providing unprecedented durable benefits to some patients with advanced cancer. The last decade has witnessed a tremendous diversification in the immunotherapy armamentarium entering clinical testing with cell therapy becoming a standard of care for some hematological malignancies, and accelerated development of next generation engineered cells, antibodies, vaccines and other biomolecules. In parallel, clinical testing of immunotherapy, often in combination with other treatments, has moved to earlier disease stages. These exciting developments generate incredible opportunities but also challenges that need to be addressed to move the field forward. The remarkable response rate observed in patients with DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer treated with anti-PD1 is one of the most powerful demonstrations of the importance of patient selection. To date only a few biomarkers predictive of response to immunotherapy have been defined, and many are dynamic and context-dependent. Thus, a critical challenge for the field is the implementation of precision immunotherapy, which will also spare patients unlikely to derive a benefit from the sometimes very serious toxicities of some immunotherapy agents. Meeting this challenge will require a multi-pronged and multi-disciplinary approach that involves efforts to develop and leverage new preclinical models, cutting-edge techniques and system biology strategies to study patients undergoing immunotherapy, and innovative clinical trials.

2. A growing wealth of data shows that it is critical to evaluate not only the tumor microenvironment but also patient's germline genetics and overall “macro-environment” to understand the determinants of response and resistance to cancer immunotherapy. In this respect, a key issue to address is ethnic and societal diversity in clinical trials of immunotherapy. The immune system’s polymorphisms have been shaped by thousands of years of selective pressure driven by infectious pathogens that are reflected in a patient’s ancestry. Thus, there is a dire need to identify biomarkers of response and toxicity that differ by ancestry. In addition, other variables such as sex, age, metabolic state, quality of nutrition, antibiotic use, stress level and physical activity need to be systematically studied to define their influence on the cross-talk between cancer and the immune system. Some of these factors are actionable but influenced by socio-economic status and other structural, cultural and educational barriers. Thus, interventions will require the engagement of multiple entities and stakeholders, including patient advocates, community leaders and social workers.

3. Progress in engineering, computational sciences and artificial intelligence is occurring at an accelerated pace, providing the tools that will enable unprecedented progress in the field of cancer immunotherapy. However, these advances come with multiple challenges: among them are the lack of standards and consensus guidelines for the use of these new tools to study patients, their exorbitant costs, and the scarcity of investigators trained to implement these technologies and critically assess their output. Thus, there is a need to engage the immuno-oncology community at large, from clinical oncologists to basic immunologists, regulatory agencies and patients, in contributing to a safe and effective collection, sharing and use of medical and scientific information. A continuous investment in research and education is essential for the training of new generations of investigators that will become increasingly multidisciplinary. Public support is critical to secure this investment. The recent pandemic has brought to the attention of the general public the importance of the immune system but has also exposed the fragility of public trust in science and the critical need to improve education and communication with multiple stakeholders, working with cancer patients as partners in the quest for more effective therapies.


What is Your Vision for SITC?

SITC has grown rapidly as a society, not only in membership, but in the breadth of initiatives that it leads, in parallel with the growth of the cancer immunotherapy field. The society has a proven record of leadership in education, training and advocacy and has provided a forum for interactions between different stakeholders. Most importantly, SITC has been the home for multidisciplinary efforts to tackle key issues in biomarker discovery and implementation, fostering discussion between scientists, clinicians, industry and regulatory agencies. It has also brought together multiple investigators to build consensus and provide timely guidelines for the use of immunotherapy in different diseases. Thus, the society should build on this expertise to tackle the emerging new challenges and continue to be a beacon for the field. SITC should also increase efforts to reach out to under-represented minorities among the scientists, clinical investigators and advocacy groups, towards the goal of mapping a road for a more diverse patient population in clinical trials of immunotherapy agents.

In addition, the society needs to remain deeply invested in basic science and innovation, which are essential to progress. To do this, a multipronged approach is required, that includes: 1) Initiatives to attract scientists working in basic immunology, autoimmunity, infectious diseases, bioengineering, computational biology, mathematical modeling, population science and other disciplines to attend the annual meeting and become SITC members; 2) Partnership with other scientific Societies; 3) Advocacy for funding dedicated to support research in cancer immunotherapy.

SITC should continue to promote forward thinking initiatives with big impact on the next generation of investigators. Programs such as Sparkathon and the Early Career Scientist Committee have already produced a new generation of very talented investigators that are ready to carry forward the society’s mission. Fostering collaborations and providing funding to young investigators will also further the unique sense of community that has shaped SITC since the early years. It is critical to identify new sources for funding to enable the growth of these very valuable programs. 

Finally, SITC should extend and reinforce its reach outside of the U.S., to become a point of reference for the entire cancer immunotherapy community across the world. The expertise of SITC members from different countries should be leveraged to identify areas of need and opportunity, one being the possibility to investigate how genetic polymorphisms and different environmental factors shape the response to immunotherapy.